Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » AutoScope Drive-in (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: AutoScope Drive-in
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 01-23-2012 09:38 AM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was not sure what sub-forum to put this in. With each car having it's own screen, how did this work? From the description in the article, how could they have put out an acceptable picture? Has anyone here ever been to one?

AutoScope Drive-in Theatre

quote: reminise.com

Autoscope drive-in movie had a screen for every car

March 2, 2011

By Shirley Triplett, Pleasanton, California

The Autoscope in Buffalo, Missouri.The Autoscope in Buffalo, Missouri opened August 1, 1954, the summer after I graduated from high school. It was a revolutionary idea, with 118 screens set up like a giant wheel, instead of one big screen.

The cars were parked in a circle, each facing its own 30- by 60-inch screen. The film was projected from a building in the center of the circle.

It was still a real drive-in, though, outdoors and under the stars.

My future husband, Paul, and I went to the Buffalo Autoscope in 1954. He even sneaked a kiss from me there.

We moved from Buffalo in 1955 when we married but moved back with our family in 1963 for about 4 years, so our children have memories of this unique drive-in.

Our son Randy remembers a time at the Autoscope when he was 6 or 7. He went to the snack shack at the center of the circle of screens, and when he came out, he was confused about where our car was parked.

Randy walked around the circle of cars until he spotted our Corvair, but when he opened the door, he found another family in the car. Someone else in town had a Corvair just like ours.

I’m not sure how successful the Autoscope was, or if it ever caught on elsewhere.

I do know the Autoscope was a real boon to Buffalo, and it served the community until 1976.

Last fall, while visiting Buffalo, we drove out Highway 65 to see the site of the Autoscope. Nothing remained of it or the single-screen drive-in that had later replaced it.

Progress had put an end to our nostalgic wanderings, but my family and I still have fond memories of our nights at the Autoscope.

About the Autoscope

The Autoscope, billed as the “world’s first private screen theatre,” was designed and built by two Dallas County Missouri men, Tom Smith and Bert Croley.

The Autoscope drive-in was built in 1954 on Highway 65 on the north edge of Buffalo, Missouri. It featured 118 30-by-60-inch screens, one for every car. The screens were arranged in a circle, the center of which contained the projection house.

The projector was made up of a “fly’s eye lens,” which was a cluster of small lenses. The film was beamed through the lens, then reflected off mirrors and through portholes in the building and onto the individual screens by rear projection.

The Buffalo Autoscope was actually the second one that Smith and Croley built. The first was a 54-screen experimental theater near Urbana, 18 miles north of Buffalo. When the men saw that their idea worked, they built the bigger drive-in in Buffalo.

The Autoscope was sold to Mr. and Mrs. Rober DeJarnette in 1974. They ran it for 2 more years, then replaced it with the more common single big screen.

There were two Autoscopes in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in the early 1960s. They survived only a few years.


 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 01-23-2012 11:06 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
 -

quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
how could they have put out an acceptable picture?
1) It was FILM
2) They had actual projectionists, not 'platter people'

But seriously, all sniping aside, I did a little poking around
the USPTO & found the patent filing for the Autoscope, which
in 'patent-ese' is better described as "an outdoor motion
picture projection display device with a plurality of screens
designed to facilitate viewing by individual automotive occupants"
(whew!)

You can learn all about how it worked by reading the patent-

"Autoscope" Patent Filing

It seems to me that the weakest link in the system which would
affect the image quality would be the 'multiple lens element' as it is
described in the patent. Despite the small screen size, it must
have taken a LOT of light to get a decent picture as the beam
had to pass through mutliple optics & mirrors!

(And notice it used two projectors. - No platters!)

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-23-2012 11:23 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think we had a picture in another thread, but I can't find it. The schematic makes it look simple, the photo of it looked like some monstrosity that would have been impossible to align. Can you imagine the job of adjusting those mirrors? Can you imagine the color fringing on those tiny lenses? The final image on those screen must have looked like anaglyphic 3D without the glasses.

So the goal of this gargantuan enterprise was to make every patron feel like he's sitting in his car watching a television set propped up outside it?

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-23-2012 12:58 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ask and ye shall receive.

Autoscope photo tour

It is my understanding, that this format of drive-in was primarily so the more 'adult' type of product could be screened whilst giving the patrons a bit more privacy. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-23-2012 01:43 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen a drive-in that was still using that big reel transport system a few years back until the thing died and had to convert to platter.

Place was situated on a hill with the building on top of the hill so no upward tilt of the projector was necessary..

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-23-2012 04:04 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
(And notice it used two projectors. - No platters!)
That would be insane. Look at the pictures. First off they are using large reels. Second TRY AND IMAGINE THE HELL of setting up TWO of that mess for a second projector! [Eek!]

I still want to see a PA35 loop ran through those.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-23-2012 10:59 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ian, thanks for the linky. What a freakin nightmare!!

Brad, I think the ONLY way they could do two projectors would be with a multiplex box like what they used to use in TV stations. It had first surface mirrors that could be moved to switch between two sources, usually a film projector and a slide projector. Most were motorized but there were some that were manually changed. Such a unit could easily adapted to this thing, especially given the agiliity the projectionists would have to have dealing with mirrors in general -- just another mirror added to the mess.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-23-2012 11:47 PM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I seem to recall that the original Autoscope used a single projector with large reels. They had two Mighty 90 carbon arc lamps at right angles to the projector with a mirror that could be swiveled to either lamp. When the first ran low on carbon they switched to the other.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-24-2012 12:16 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting idea Frank. However I would think that none of the mirror alignment would be the "projectionist's responsibility". I seem to remember reading somewhere that there was only one guy who could align them.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 01-24-2012 09:33 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
That would be insane. Look at the pictures.
I based my "two projector" comment on the patent diagram, which
shows two projectors in the booth. But as the photos show, there
was clearly a difference between idea and implementation.
. . . and I 100% agree with you, attempting to align that maze
of mirrors & lenses for one projector alone was probably a
nightmare, but two would defineatley be 'insane' as you said!

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-24-2012 09:50 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The phototour shows a Christie lamp of 2500 watts or less. Scuttlebutt at the time, confirmed porn as the primary target and , according to the local Altec tech, was a bear to set up.

I don't think they ever had more than 3 or 4 of them. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-24-2012 10:59 AM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the early sixties, Life magazine had an issue devoted to movies with a color, nightime photo of the theatre in Albuquerque with a the screens all lit up

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-24-2012 11:39 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Focus and framing must have been fun. Also, how would one see the cues in a two-machine installation of this type?

I'm sure that this was a novelty at the time, but the whole thing seems sort of dumb. Might as well just park in your own driveway and put a TV set on the hood.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-24-2012 02:41 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With one bulb having its light split into 118 screens after having been reflected off a couple of mirrors, I'll bet brightness was not so good.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-24-2012 03:10 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not to mention the rear projection screen material's (in)ability to withstand the elements.

Would love to see an aerial shot of that place working though, just to see all those beams spoking out from the central building.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.