Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Lawrence and Fathom

   
Author Topic: Lawrence and Fathom
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-03-2012 10:47 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lawrence of Arabia 50th Anniversary presentation by Fathom is tomorrow night (Oct 4). According to Variety, it was scanned at 8k and reduced to 4k. My question is, does Fathom send out DCP's of this, or is it a satellite presentation. If DCPs, 4k? If satellite, what resolution?

and if you are interested, from the article:
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118060183?refCatId=13
quote:
Among those Sony showed the film to in the last few weeks were cinematographers Stephen Burum ("The Untouchables," "Rumblefish") and John Toll ("The Thin Red Line," "Legends of the Fall"), who praised the effort -- with reservations.

"They left in the grain," said Burum, "so it had the texture of film. What I thought was really interesting is that after all these years of people going on and on about digital, they finally have gotten to level that's almost as good as 70mm. That means when they go to the next stage they're finally going to have a system that's going to be much better."

Toll said he had "mixed feelings" but that "the idea of ('Lawrence') having another life is fantastic." The two-time Oscar winner said he's seen the film projected about 15 times and felt some aspects of the restoration, especially the desert vistas, benefitted in ways that were dramatic.

"You can see a scene with Peter O'Toole and Omar Sharif in the foreground and two or three hundred guys on camels in the background and you can actually see them all and you can actually see expressions on their faces," explained Toll.

But the d.p. felt the more intimate moments didn't fare as well. "Where you're not looking at a frame loaded with detail, you don't care about detail," he explained. "So it does sort of sanitize it in a way that I think is not an advantage. If it's not so highly resolved it makes it more sympathetic somehow."

The abbreviated theatrical rollout to be projected digitally, presented by NCM Fathom Events and SPE, will be accompanied by a filmed intro by Scorsese and Sharif.



 |  IP: Logged

Edward Havens
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 614
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Mar 2008


 - posted 10-03-2012 12:05 PM      Profile for Edward Havens   Email Edward Havens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep, Fathom sent out hard drives earlier this week, splitting the movie in to two parts with the intermission as its own separate file. Five files in total, including a half-hour pre-show and a fifteen minute behind the scenes look at the making of the movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 10-03-2012 12:08 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's great news. I was worried about it being a broadcast, like Casablanca, which looked awful.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 10-03-2012 04:08 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
technically it's two showings tomorrow and with the clarification that it's being shown in the largest auditorium at AMC Mazza - I am major excited - going to watch this, take a nap, dinner and then go to the 'Nightmare Before Christmas'/'Frankenweenie' double feature at Tysons at 10:30pm .... hoozah!

I actually was surprised at the recent Fathom screening of 'The Birds' which while a taped satellite feed - looked really really good. Normally any feature getting the Fathom treatment gets me wanting to reach for a bucket to puke in.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-03-2012 05:31 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
"So it does sort of sanitize it in a way that I think is not an advantage. If it's not so highly resolved it makes it more sympathetic somehow."
More "vague enough to sound profound, nonspecific enough that I can get away with it" baloney. Any minute now, he'll start going on about "organic, shimmering film grain". [Roll Eyes]

Anyway, I saw the 4k DCP of Lawrence without the NCM stuff just this last Sunday, in a beautiful projection. Looked really damned great, and this is from someone who has seen the same movie in 70mm many times (the last time with several seconds of on-screen sprocket marks). Since the negative is said to be long past a photo-chemical/wet-gate style restoration of this quality, this is probably the best that the film will be seen from now on, unless an 8K projection system appears. It is MORE than adequate.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 10-04-2012 05:11 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
hat's off to Sony/Fathom to by far the best DCP presentation of a classic film I've seen to date - the 4K resolution was utterly startling and while it's not true 70mm, but damn, the wonderfully saturated colors, the clarity and sharpness knocked this out of the ball park - wow, wow, and wow!

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Kane
Film Handler

Posts: 74
From: corpus christi, tx
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 10-07-2012 03:59 PM      Profile for Jeff Kane   Email Jeff Kane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lucky you. The Cinemark Century 16 down here ran it in one of their smaller auditoriums. IT WAS OUT OF FOCUS! Truly, we might as well have been watching a DVD. That blurry. Went to complain during the 'making-of' documentary and was told "Sorry, nobody around that can fix it". It was also way obvious that the theater was EQ'ed for modern tizz-boom soundtracks... major midbass bloat that did the score no favors. But for all that? Still loved it.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 10-07-2012 10:40 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw it locally at a Cinemark. It looked and sounded good, but I'd equate it to a good 35mm presentation, despite being billed as "4K". The 70mm I saw at the Aero in Santa Monica was much much better.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.