|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: What happen to the Cartoons?
|
Steve Matz
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 672
From: Billings, Montana, USA
Registered: Sep 2003
|
posted 01-26-2014 07:42 PM
I'm sure there are more than a few forum Members that remember the old Single Screen Days on Saturdays. You saw a Cartoon,News Reel,2 reeler,A Serial(or Chapter Play as Cathy Bates Character called it) and at least 2 sometime 4 features. In other words the Perfect Afternoon Babysitter for Parents in the 50's,early 60's.
My friend here that opened-up a double screen Drive-in the 90's wanted some of the nostalgia of the old Days; so he wanted to show a Cartoon before the Feature Started. No such Luck, Film exchanges said they no longer carried Cartoons of any Kind.
So what happen to all these TOONS. Were the Prints that were still in good shape sent back to the Studios, Were they chopped up, Burnt, etc. I remember seeing The old Fleischer,Lantz,IB TECH Cartoons and they were in excellent condition coming on 1000ft Goldberg Reels. Really a shame that a kid today can't see a Real Cartoon on the Big Screen like they use to be Made. This computer generated Garbage they see today is Pathetic...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 01-26-2014 10:39 PM
After one of the big chains (AMC I think) did a promotional run on a bunch of the Looney Tunes in the '90s, Kit Parker Films had them for rent. You could rent them in sets of three, at 3 months for $150.00. (You picked the titles you wanted out of a catalog and they would each come on one reel -- OR, they had various "combos" that had three toons spliced onto one reel.) So you could play any or all of them during that period as much as you wanted. We used to pick out the 3 movies that most "needed" a cartoon--maybe a Disney flick, or a very popular movie that we thought might need a little more concession time, etc.
The prints ran from decent to trashed, with some being spliced-up or having the beginning or ending footage clipped off. There's nothing worse, cartoonwise, than not hearing the opening slide guitar "riff" of the Looney Tunes logo!
Overall I found that people didn't really appreciate the cartoons for what they were. I talked them up a lot, with the "you're seeing them on the big screen where they were MEANT to be seen" or "you're seeing something people haven't seen in a theater in over 50 years," etc. but people were mostly "eh," probably because the cartoons were overexposed on TV. I think they might have helped concession sales a bit though.
Even after that, I still wish we could get WB to offer a deal where they would grant a "blanket" license for a theatre to play a Looney Tune cartoon for a week. We'd pay the license fee, and agree to play only one toon at a time. We'd create our own DCP from a Blu Ray, so no production expense on their part. But I've been told they won't consider such a thing, and I suppose even if they did, the fee would be ridiculous...I think $25 would be about right but I'll bet they'd want $100 or more.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 01-27-2014 12:34 PM
A lot of preservation activity has been done on "short subjects" (not just cartoons, but newsreels, "interest" films and historical trailers as well) since the late '90s, because the emergence of the DVD extra feature created a beast that needed to be fed. Both the studios and the big non-profit archives have done a lot of work on this material, and there have been collaborative projects, too (e.g. between Warners and UCLA in preserving the Vitaphone musical shorts from the '20s, many of which have been reissued on DVDs and BDs such as The Jazz Singer, and shown on 35mm at occasional festivals).
Agreed with Kenneth that some titles would be very problematic just to drop into a regular program (infamous examples here and here, but there are many other milder examples that still wouldn't be appreciated by many in a mainstream theatre setting now).
Some censored versions have been published - for example, there was a Tom and Jerry DVD set that did the rounds in Britain around a decade ago, in which Mammy's African-American accent was dubbed over with a more neutral one and some of her scenes cut altogether (plus some other politically incorrect shots, e.g. Tom blowing himself up and then appearing as a blackface caricature when the smoke clears).
So if the studios are comfortable with whatever they publish on consumer media, I can't see how they'd have a problem with the same material being screened theatrically. And as Mike points out, a well-mastered BD can in many circumstances match an indifferent 2K DCP for subjective image quality, and so making them available to exhibitors again would purely be a case of licensing, i.e. virtually zero cost to the distributor.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 01-27-2014 03:11 PM
Agreed - they're very incisive social commentary. Wabbit Twouble anticipated the environmentalist movement over four decades before their concerns became mainstream. It explores the concerns both that car use/tourism damages natural beauty spots etc., and the idea that these places have to be packaged up and made safe for the new urban middle classes to visit (hence Elmer bringing a carload of mod cons with him). The Isle of Pingo Pongo does the same thing (natives on a desert island have to perform bang up to date western jazz in order to be tourist-friendly, and far from appreciating the native culture, all Elmer wants to do is shoot them), but that aspect has been (understandably, I guess) undermined by the obvious racism issues.
Another one of my favorites is Bugs and Elmer parodying The Barber of Seville. It's full of jokes that you're simply not going to get unless you know at least something both about opera and the homoerotic references (neither of which is likely to apply to anyone younger than upper teens). Interestingly, this one makes jokes about homosexuality that are (to me, at any rate) every bit as potentially problematic as the racist ones in some of the infamous "censored eleven", but yet it's still easily and legally available, and has even been shown with a live orchestra at the Hollywood Bowl not so long ago.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|