Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Tarantino Puts His Money Where His Mouth Is (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Tarantino Puts His Money Where His Mouth Is
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-05-2014 01:40 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
because we need yet another Tarantino and Film Topic [Wink]
Will he run out of money before he runs out of film?

Tarantino to Program The New Beverly
quote:
Quentin Tarantino on the New Beverly: “After 7 Years as Owner, I Wanted to Make It Mine.”
Comments (8) By Chuck Wilson Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:30 AM
Categories: Film And TV

Quentin Tarantino - GETTY WIRE IMAGE COURTESY OF FILM INDEPENDENT
Getty Wire Image courtesy of Film Independent Quentin Tarantino
For L.A. movie lovers, the New Beverly Cinema revival house is sacred territory. Filmmaker Quentin Tarantino (Pulp Fiction, Django Unchained) owns the theater, but it’s always been managed and programmed by Michael Torgan, son of the theater’s founder, the late Sherman Torgan. When rumors reached us that Tarantino would be taking over as full-time programmer, we reached out to him for clarification, and were delighted when he returned our call. For the record, we also reached out to Michael Torgan, but were unable to connect with him. (We hope he’s taking a well-deserved vacation.)

L.A. WEEKLY: How did you come to be involved with the New Beverly, as an owner?

QUENTIN TARANTINO: Sherman Torgan opened the New Beverly [in 1978] and had been running it for decades. I had been going there forever. And somewhere in the last four years of Sherman running the theater, word got to me that it might close. So I started supplementing him, started giving him about $5,000 a month, to pay his bills, and meet his expenses. He never had to pay it back. I love Los Angeles, and I love the New Beverly, and I didn’t want to see it go. But then, unfortunately, Sherman died [in June 2007]. And the people who owned the property wanted to turn it into a Super Cuts. So, working through Michael, I was able to buy the property. And Michael’s been running the theater ever since. I could say, ‘Hey, Michael, can we do this, can we show that?’ but basically it’s been Michael’s baby. He’s really done a Herculean job. But after seven years as owner, I wanted to make it mine.

Is it true that you offered Michael the chance to stay on as manager but not as programmer, and he declined?

We’re still figuring that out. I want him to be involved as much as possible.

You’re passionate about the survival of 35 millimeter film. Is that what this is about?

That was the thing that pushed me over to say, ‘Now’s the time to do it.’ I want the New Beverly to be a bastion for 35 millimeter films. I want it to stand for something. When you see a film on the New Beverly calendar, you don’t have to ask whether it’s going to be shown in DCP [Digital Cinema Projection] or in 35 millimeter. You know it’s playing in 35 because it’s the New Beverly.

See also: Movie Studios Are Forcing Hollywood to Abandon 35mm Film. But the Consequences of Going Digital Are Vast, and Troubling

Was there pressure on Michael, and on you to bring digital projection to the New Beverly?

Michael brought in digital for the simple fact that besides being a revival house, the New Beverly is an art film second-run house. So, if Frances Ha does well in general release, a month or two later, it plays at the New Beverly, along with something similar. But the companies that release those kinds of movies don’t even make prints anymore. My feeling is, ‘Fuck those guys.' I want young filmmakers to want their movie to screen at the New Beverly so badly that they demand a print as part of the deal they make with Magnolia or Roadside Attractions or whoever. ‘You have to strike a 35 millimeter print so we can show it at the New Beverly! You’re not paying me jack-shit, you’re ripping me off, but that’s one thing you can do!’ [Laughs. Heartily.]

There’s a notion out there that Quentin Tarantino is going to turn the New Beverly into a B-movie, grindhouse theater.

No, no, no, not at all. That double-feature format that Sherman came up with, we’re keeping. We’ll be doing the thing the New Beverly does so well—we’ll have Fassbender double-features, Truffaut double-features, The Thin Man movies, all that. But I have a really, really huge film print collection that I’ve been curating for almost 20 years now. And I want to show my prints! [Laughs.] We’ll still be borrowing prints from the studios and other collectors, but I like the idea that the base of what we’re doing will be my print collection. Some of them are absolutely amazing, and I want people to see them, to enjoy them.

What are the prints you prize most?

I have all three Sergio Leone Clint Eastwood movies in I.B. Technicolor. Magnificent looking. I just saw the DCP restoration of A Fistful of Dollars at Cannes. I introduced it. I felt like I was watching a DVD. I said, ‘Why didn’t you ask me to bring my fucking print?’ They said, ‘Well, there was three extra minutes in this.’ I said, ‘I’ve seen that movie a million times and I didn’t notice those extra minutes. I just noticed that it looked like a fucking DVD.’

We’re adding six-track stereo sound to the theater, because I have quite a few prints that are six-track mag [magnetic] sound. They’ll sound amazing. And we’ll be adding a 16 millimeter projector too because I have a big 16 collection, too, and sometimes, especially for that second movie, a 16 is just perfect. And there’s my big, huge trailer collection, and there’s all the cartoons and shorts that I have. Concession stand bumpers, too. Vintage ‘50s, ‘60s, ‘70s. Some really groovy stuff.

On Saturday, we’ll keep the weird midnight movie thing. It’s a tradition. But the Friday midnight will always be one of my movies. One month it’ll be Reservoir Dogs, another month it’ll be Death Proof, another month Django. The idea being that if you actually want to see one of my movies on 35 millimeter film, you’ll have a place to do so.

It’s your theater, after all.

Well, I don’t feel so bad about it because Sherman played Reservoir Dogs at midnight on Friday and Saturday for three years!

It’s been said that you, the busy filmmaker who’s about to make a new movie [The Hateful Eight], will be programming each day of every month, all year long. Is that true?

Listen, I’ve had a million ideas for double-features and such, for a long, long time. I’ve been holding off, waiting for this moment. I’m going to program the first three months. But then the other people working in the theater can put together the schedule. I’ll always have lots of ideas, but they’re creative, they’re excited, they want to come up with their own thing. But yeah, these first three months will be my perspective entirely.


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-05-2014 03:01 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder, when he goes to show one of those old prints he owns, does he have to pay the license fee to the studios like the rest of us do? Or do they just blow it off because it's Quentin Tarantino?

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 09-05-2014 06:51 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe we should still merge it with this topic, because it's essentially the same discussion? [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-05-2014 09:30 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tarantino is now a theater manager? And he likes 35mm projection? These two qualities rarely mesh. I wonder what kind of projector he has up there. God forbid it's a Brenkert. Hopefully it's a Century JJ with a sweet-ass Christie SLC lamphouse. Oh, and an orange ORC platter to cause the problems that the projectionist is required to have.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-05-2014 09:39 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So he loves 35mm...and is shooting his next movie in 65mm for a 70mm release...will he upgrade to 70mm at his theatre?

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-05-2014 10:15 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Maybe we should still merge it with this topic, because it's essentially the same discussion?

Well, this one started first [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 09-05-2014 10:38 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
Tarantino is now a theater manager? And he likes 35mm projection? These two qualities rarely mesh. I wonder what kind of projector he has up there. God forbid it's a Brenkert. Hopefully it's a Century JJ with a sweet-ass Christie SLC lamphouse. Oh, and an orange ORC platter to cause the problems that the projectionist is required to have.
According to page 4 of this article 2 years ago, Simplex XLs.

http://www.laweekly.com/2012-04-12/film-tv/35-mm-film-digital-Hollywood/?storyPage=4

quote:
...has already gone through two DCP-compliant projectors in three years — in both cases, through no fault of the lab's. (By contrast, the Simplex XL 35mm projectors at New Beverly are going strong at 60 years old. Like all analog projectors, they use an intermittent sprocket, a cog and a pivot — the same basic gear as a sewing machine.)...

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-05-2014 10:43 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One can only hope that the remodeling gets rid of that mid-70's porno theatre vibe the place has, but I suspect QT actually likes that.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-06-2014 01:45 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Simplex XLs are OK (after some modification like this one I wrote here, typos and all). 1/4 of all the auditoriums at the Greenwood Plaza multiplex I worked at were the 35/70 kind. They were... OK. But if Quentin wants to do 70mm right he should source out some Century JJs. Simplexes are fun to thread but Centurys are even more fun to thread. Plus they're Centurys, they handle 70mm better.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-06-2014 07:26 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I couldn't agree more. For archival purposes and especially running 70mm, the Simplex is not the projector to have. Those are fantastic grindhouse projectors, but until the mod in Joe's link is done are not archival-quality machines in my book. (Even post-mod the oil leaking must be controlled.)

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-06-2014 08:23 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Related thread:

Tarrantino ditches digital at New Beverly

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 09-06-2014 09:35 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
Tarantino is now a theater manager? And he likes 35mm projection? These two qualities rarely mesh.
Can you imagine him front of house? [Eek!]

Customer: "A medium popcorn and a Coke, please."

Tarantino: "It's not Coke, OK. We don't sell that fuckin' liquid shit here. It's Big Kahuna Cola, OK? I mean, any fuckin' asshole knows that we don't serve Coca fuckin' Cola. You don't fuck with that cheap fuckin' soda in my theater, OK, pal? [produces gun and shoots customer]" ... to co-worker: "Well, what are you staring at? Get his ass outta here! What is this place, a fuckin' mortuary? Do we have a fuckin' sign out the fuckin' front that says 'Dead moviegoer storage'? Fuck, I mean, do we?"

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-06-2014 10:51 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will the usherettes be barefoot?

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-06-2014 11:09 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For this application, I would take Norelco AA-IIs over Century JJs for 35/70 machines. They are gentler on film (and better at handling shrunken or otherwise damaged film) and the parts never seem to wear out.

I have not operated the current Kinoton FP75Es, but those may be a good choice as well.

Leo--that is hilarious...and probably true.

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 09-07-2014 10:18 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Don't get me wrong, I love that QT is trying to keep film alive...

But judging from pictures on the intertubes, the New Beverly screen looks pretty small, roughly 25' wide? (I've never been to the NB.) Digital probably doesn't look too bad there.

If you're trying to show off film, wouldn't it make more sense to do it on a bigger screen, like the Newport Big 6 or the Continental in Denver (before Regal screwed it up)?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.