Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: AMC Entertainment, Regal to Acquire and Release 8-10 Films a Year

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Community » Film-Yak » AMC Entertainment, Regal to Acquire and Release 8-10 Films a Year

Author

Topic: AMC Entertainment, Regal to Acquire and Release 8-10 Films a Year

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004

posted 03-07-2011 06:23 PM

AMC Entertainment, Regal to Acquire and Release 8-10 Films a Year

Source: hollywoodreporter.com

quote:
NEW YORK – Film exhibition giants AMC Entertainment and Regal Entertainment Group are getting into the Hollywood studio business amid a decline in major studio output in recent years.

The two largest U.S. theatrical exhibitors on Monday unveiled the launch of Open Road Films, a new acquisition-focused film distribution venture that they said will concentrate on an array of wide-release movies. Based in LA, the company will distribute approximately eight to 10 movies per year – and not only to the venture partners’ screens. It expects to release its first film later this year, the companies said.

Former Lionsgate and Weinstein Company executive Tom Ortenberg will serve as CEO of Open Road. Most recently Ortenberg founded entertainment consulting firm One Way Out Media.

“Open Road Films will approach movie distribution with discipline, focus and innovation,” said Ortenberg. “With strong support from exhibition we will market and distribute wide-release motion pictures in an effective, cost-efficient manner, playing in all theatre chains across the country.”

“As major studio releases have declined in recent years, Open Road Films will fill an important gap that exists in the market today for consumers, movie producers and theatrical exhibitors,” said AMC president and CEO Gerry Lopez. “We are committed to providing a wide array of movies – year round – that appeal to all of our diverse groups of guests.”

Regal CEO Amy Miles said the joint venture will enable “more great stories to reach the big screen.”

| IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002

posted 03-08-2011 06:18 AM

I wonder how important the presentation quality of their own movies will be to them.

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 03-08-2011 10:14 AM

It will be interesting to see if it is digital only.

| IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002

posted 03-08-2011 02:35 PM

Or if they will lock each other out when they have competing theaters close by.

| IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 03-11-2011 05:03 PM

They better not release any movies in scope, since most of their screens are common-width!

| IP: Logged

Caleb Johnstone-Cowan
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 593
From: London, UK
Registered: Mar 2006

posted 03-11-2011 08:45 PM

Surely investing in the product introduces a level of risk in to the business that doesn't exist if you're an exhibitor? Hollwyood can give us a bum film slate some weeks but most theatres should have the flexibility to reduce payroll hours and stock held to reduce the cost of exhibition. If it is your own film that flops there's no escaping the consequences. When I worked for UGC the rumour was they sold off their UK sites because they had produced one or two big-budget films in France that really under-performed.

| IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 03-12-2011 05:50 AM

I guess the Paramount Consent Decrees which have been pretty much skuttled over the years are now completely vacated. What's the difference between a distributor owning an exhibition chain or exhibition chains owning a film distribution entity? Won't that present the same conflict of interest? Won't AMC and every other theatre operator see this as a way for those two chains to manipulate film distribution deals in their favor? Isn't that inherantly rife with restraint of trade possibilities which is why Paramount was forced to divest its theatre holdings in the first place? Or has anti-trust become passe at Justice?

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 03-12-2011 11:04 AM

I heard Kevin Smith's new movie's distribution rights was auctioned for the winning bid $1 and was sold to Smith himself, supposedly being so awful nobody else would even touch it...for a dollar! Maybe they should have started there! [Razz]

| IP: Logged

Ben Wales
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Southampton. England
Registered: Jul 99

posted 03-12-2011 02:36 PM

Those of us here in the Uk can remember those 1980's "Classic Epics" Cannon Films at the local Cannon Cinemas! [Smile]

| IP: Logged

Jim Henk
Master Film Handler

Posts: 364
From: San Diego, CA
Registered: Feb 2006

posted 03-13-2011 02:11 PM

quote: Frank Angel
Isn't that inherantly rife with restraint of trade possibilities which is why Paramount was forced to divest its theatre holdings in the first place? Or has anti-trust become passe at Justice?

As my college US Government class prof used to say, "Nothing is illegal, until it is challenged in court." And he was a lawyer.

| IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99

posted 03-13-2011 08:18 PM

Well this is quite clearly a punch-back to the 30-day VOD threat from the majors. I hope it is an out-of-the-park success. They'll need to find a blockbuster or two to make that happen though...

| IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003

posted 03-14-2011 10:52 PM

AMC distrubeted a movie back in '04 that was played off a dvd on their video projectors and they charged full price...so I doubt quality will be terribly important. I cant remember the name of the movie.

| IP: Logged

John Lasher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Newark, DE
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 03-15-2011 09:48 AM

quote: "Brad Miller"
I heard Kevin Smith's new movie's distribution rights was auctioned for the winning bid $1 and was sold to Smith himself, supposedly being so awful nobody else would even touch it...for a dollar! Maybe they should have started there!

I heard that was his slap in the face to the many struggling independent filmmakers (just like him 16-or-so years ago with "Clerks") who self-distribute route out of necessity, or a desire to protect their work.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.