|
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: UK Release Date For ‘The Tree of Life’ Leads to Legal Entanglement
|
System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi
Posts: 215
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 04-01-2011 08:44 PM
UK Release Date For ‘The Tree of Life’ Leads to Legal Entanglement
Source: slashfilm.com
quote: The weirdest movie business story of the week involves Terrence Malick‘s new film The Tree of Life. Fox Searchlight bought the film for US distribution, and in concert with Summit International, which holds rights to the film in other territories, planned to premiere the picture at Cannes just before a late May opening in the States.
Then Icon announced that it would open the film in the UK on May 4 — before the Cannes premiere, therefore possibly blowing away the well-laid plans of Fox Searchlight and Summit Int’l. Summit didn’t take kindly to that and is now taking action against Icon, which holds distro rights for the film in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. The result is two-fold: we get a look into how complicated international distribution can be, and for people who live in Icon’s territories we’ve got to wonder if the film will be significantly delayed, and if so for how long.
The Playlist did a good recap of the story, pointing out that when a financier sells distribution rights to different companies in different territories, it is really only by the grace of a basic social contract that one doesn’t step all over the other with the sort of thunder-stealing release date Icon set. There’s also the fact that the UK date set by Icon could easily change, and that until the UK release story broke in Empire, Summit and Fox Searchlight really didn’t know what Icon was planning.
Jeff Wells chimes in with a statement from Summit,
“The information regarding the May 4th UK release [of The Tree of Life] is incorrect. Icon Film Distribution Ltd. does not have the right to distribute The Tree of Life in the UK, as it is in default of its agreement. The matter is pending before an arbitration tribunal in Los Angeles.”
And Anne Thompson says that, despite Summit’s insistence that Icon holds no rights, Icon bought rights to the movie for a “high minimum guarantee, and was trying to get out of releasing the film.” In other words, Icon has to pay financier Bill Pohlad a lot of money no matter how well the film does, and the company is just now realizing that a multi-generational Terrence Malick film about family, man’s place in the world and the universe in general might not be the most commercial prospect. Did Icon just see “Brad Pitt & Sean Penn” on the cast sheet and sign up with no further thought?
All this is pretty ‘inside baseball,’ but it is good to be reminded once in a while that the simple business of getting a movie out to audiences is never really simple. And if Summit really does manage to slap down Icon, what will be done about releasing the film in the UK and possibly Australia and New Zealand?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|