Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » James Cameron on 'Battleship' Movie: "This Degrades the Cinema"

   
Author Topic: James Cameron on 'Battleship' Movie: "This Degrades the Cinema"
System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 01-10-2011 05:15 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 
James Cameron on 'Battleship' Movie: "This Degrades Cinema"

Source: Cinematical.com

quote:
Say what you will about James Cameron (just don't insult 'True Lies' in my immediate vicinity), but there's no denying that the man has a deep and abiding love for spectacle. Like God playing Kid Pix, Cameron mines and furthers technology in his relentless quest to create vivid cinematic pageants on an inconceivably epic scale, and he does so with a guileless sincerity that flouts the snark of our age. Not only does he refuse to wink at the camera, he's probably inventing a camera that refuses to render winks in the first place. In other words, dude takes his popcorn flicks very seriously, and he gets a bit pissed when you don't.

With that in mind, Cameron doesn't think much of Universal's forthcoming $200 million blockbuster 'Battleship,' which isn't a remake of 'Battleship Potemkin' so much as it's a movie based on a board-game so simple that Elle Fanning could reliably defeat Mike Leigh about 50% of the time (note to Universal: I would happily pay IMAX prices to watch that match-up).

Cameron recently sat down for an interview with the German site Spiegel Online (though our report comes via Movieline), and decided that it was high time he let loose his opinion on Hasbro's ambitious adaptation. He began by pronouncing that "We have a story crisis," and then proceeded to make things a bit more personal: "They want to make the Battleship game into a film... This is pure desperation."

As Cameron's brief rant goes on, it seems that he regards 'Battleship' as a particularly sad case of marque taking precedence over merit. He expounded: "Everyone in Hollywood knows how important it is that a film is a brand before it hit theaters. If a brand has been around, Harry Potter for example, or Spider-Man, you are light years ahead. And there lies the problem. Because unfortunately these franchises are become more ridiculous. Battleship. This degrades the cinema."

It's worth noting (albeit unnecessary to do so) that Cameron recently released a movie called 'Avatar,' an original property which laid waste to just about every modern box office record there is. In that light, it's tempting to read Cameron's comments as an ornery manifestation of his ego, as if he's underscoring the sad depths Hollywood has to plumb for franchises when he can conjure juggernauts directly from his own imagination. On the other hand, Universal is making a movie adapted from a board-game so simple that it can be won without even knowing the back half of the alphabet. And instead of varnishing the tentpole flick with a veneer of gravitas, Universal has seen it fit to populate their cast with pop-star Rihanna and tennis enthusiast / model Brooklyn Decker. Director Peter Berg has proven himself quite capable of creating visceral popcorn experiences, but 'Battleship' is certainly targeting the precise coordinates of our collective cynicism.

As for Cameron -- who has a recent history of disparaging substandard Hollywood fare -- the man has earned the right to speak his mind. His films might be waylaid by rather facile plots, but the effort and passion with which he devotes himself to his craft is beyond reproach. That someone of his esteem is refusing to be complacent is admirable, and it's a breath of fresh air for such an icon to be so unabashedly candid. Of course, at the end of the day it's we as the audience who are collectively endowed with the most powerful voice of all: our wallets. If you don't want a 'Battleship 2: The Quickening,' don't see 'Battleship.'

What do you guys make of all this? Are you happy to hear Cameron voicing his complaints, or would you rather he keep it to himself? Are projects like 'Battleship' actively hurting film culture? Am I the only one who's going to moan about it for the next 18 months and then see it on opening night, anyway?


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-10-2011 09:17 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kudos for Cameron on speaking his mind about this stuff. Although Cameron has more than enough clout that he can shoot his mouth off about almost any movie project or almost anyone in Hollywood and not pay any sort of price for it.

I'd like to see someone take this issue a step farther. Ridicule the customers crazy enough to line up for all the derivative swill vomiting out of Hollywood. They're paying for this shit and by paying they're endorsing even more of this shit to be produced.

The endless parade of re-makes, sequels, TV shows blown up to the big screen and even movies about video games and super heroes is pretty tiring. It's removed a lot of my enthusiasm about seeing new movies. Add to that how ill-behaved some customers are in movie theaters, striving to ruin the movie-going experience for dozens of other viewers nearby. I find it amazing the industry can still attract visitors to theaters in the numbers that have been attending lately.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 01-11-2011 05:28 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think people still get bored, and still love going out to the movies just to get out. The problem is that there is so much crap, they are just getting used to it, jaded even. The standards just keep falling further and further in their eyes. What I wouldn't give for another 1939.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Howard
Film Handler

Posts: 44
From: Forster, NSW, Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 01-13-2011 12:52 AM      Profile for Peter Howard   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Howard   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm sick of just about every US summer film being made for 15 year old boys. Unfortunately, 15 year old boys are not my primary market and it's winter in Australia, so films like 'Thor' and 'Transformers 3' will have a shelf life of about 2 weeks but i'm stuck running them for 4 or 5 weeks. [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-13-2011 01:15 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This year's Christmas crop looked substandard to me so we (for the first time in about 8 years) did not run any movies on the break this year during Christmas. We ran Harry Potter over Thanksgiving and that was it. Over-long playtimes are the reason. They're starting to insist on 3 weeks for everything. (3 weeks for Narnia? Gimme a break.)

I'd probably play a new movie every week, and pay the 60% or so, if we could just get a one-week or two-week playtime.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 01-17-2011 11:20 AM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And "Pirates of the Caribbean" was ridiculed for being based on a Disney ride, but it actually was a pretty good movie.

Cameron is the last person who should be complaining about derivative movies considering that the Avatar storyline was basically a combination of Dances With Wolves, The Last Samurai and Fern Gully, as has been noted so many times before.

Most movies are crap, but you know what? They always were. It's just that we tend to remember only the great ones (whether you consider "great" to mean either commercial success or artistic merit). But if you check newspapers from any era, you'll see that most films made were garbage. This is not an indictment of film. Most books published are trash as well - whenever I go to the bookstore, I really have to wonder how the decision was made to publish most books.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-17-2011 01:51 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin Brooks
"Pirates of the Caribbean" was ridiculed for being based on a Disney ride, but it actually was a pretty good movie
I wish just once, when they stumble upon a pretty good movie like that and it turns into a hit, they would resist the urge to flog and milk it until it's nothing but a pitiful shadow of itself.

 |  IP: Logged

Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-17-2011 02:26 PM      Profile for Hillary Charles   Email Hillary Charles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I wish just once, when they stumble upon a pretty good movie like that and it turns into a hit, they would resist the urge to flog and milk it until it's nothing but a pitiful shadow of itself.

Unfortunately, there's a tradition voiced so eloquently by Ernie Kovacs at the beginning of this clip. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.