Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Why the Studios Are Trusting Untested Directors for Major Jobs

   
Author Topic: Why the Studios Are Trusting Untested Directors for Major Jobs
System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 02-18-2011 04:45 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 
Why the Studios Are Trusting Untested Directors for Major Jobs

Source: Hollywoodreporter.com

quote:
Hollywood loves discovering new talent. But its passion for developing emerging filmmakers has lately strayed into large-scale, downright risky terrain.

Case in point: Universal is in the process of handing director Carl Rinsch a $170 million budget for 47 Ronin, a 3D samurai revenge story starring Keanu Reeves that will begin shooting March 14 in Budapest. Rinsch’s résumé includes a popular short film and a Heineken commercial — but no features.

And he’s far from the only fresh-faced director stepping into the big-budget fray. Disney gave commercials helmer Joseph Kosinski close to $200 million for Tron: Legacy. Universal recently hired first-timer Rupert Sanders to helm the $100 million-plus Snow White and the Huntsman. Relative newbies Marc Webb, who’s shooting Sony’s The Amazing Spider-Man, and Daniel Espinosa, who’s helming Universal’s action thriller Safe House, took on the potential blockbusters with little previous feature work.

It’s not an entirely new phenomenon, but for several reasons the scale and justifications behind the hires have changed. During the 1990s, commercial and music video directors such as David Fincher (Alien 3, 1992), Michael Bay (Bad Boys, 1995), Gore Verbinski (Mousehunt, 1997) and McG (Charlie’s Angels, 2000) made the jump to features, but most of them did so with comparatively modest budgets.

During the past five years, though, technology has enabled rookie directors to hone their skills via FinalCut Pro, digital-video cameras and other state-of-the-art effects tools from a young age, prompting budget-cautious studios to salivate over what they can put on screen for a price. Gareth Edwards, for instance, made his indie sci-fi film Monsters for a few hundred thousand dollars, even though it looked much more expensive. He’s now up to direct Godzilla for Warner Bros.

“It’s a reflection on the innovation of emerging filmmakers,” says Anonymous Content manager Michael Sugar, who reps Webb and Kosinski. “You’re looking at people like Fede Alvarez, who made a short film (Panic Attack!) for $300, put it on YouTube, and it looks like it was made for $20 million.” Alvarez, an Anonymous client, was hired by Sam Raimi’s Ghost House Pictures to develop a sci-fi feature.

More than ever before, the short film and commercial environment has become a playground to use up-to-the-minute tech to create feature-film calling cards. Sanders, District 9 co-writer-director Neill Blomkamp and Noam Murro — recently hired by Fox to direct the fifth Die Hard — all did spots for recent Halo video game campaigns, a gig that has become as coveted as any debut film job because it often becomes a higher-profile entry into features.

Ad-world veterans also tend to be more comfortable making presentations in front of dozens of studio execs, and to be handy with creating the rip reels, animatics and annotated screenplays that the studios now want to see. These days, when execs say yes to a spec package, they aren’t saying yes to development but to a movie, with a budget, detailed vision and release date.

“If you look at the way movies are being sold into the studios, whether it’s Safe House or All You Need Is Kill or Snow and the Seven —those are spec screenplays that were either sold in with a director or developed to the point where they were movies,” says Management 360 manager-producer Darin Friedman, who reps Kill writer D.W. Harper and director Adam Berg.

A visionary director can simply send a link to his short to someone in the industry, and everyone’s seen it within an hour.
At the same time, the screenwriting community has largely abandoned the spec approach — what was for a long time Hollywood’s prime idea factory. In the last few years, studios have made brutal trims to slates and development overhead. Filmmakers are now bypassing writer-provided original material by building a creative pipeline to funnel their own spec packages directly to producers and execs.

Alvarez’s short film got him noticed all over town. Berg’s short Carousel, made for Philips TV, had him up for the job of helming the big-budget X-Men spinoff Deadpool for Fox. James Mather and Stephen St. Leger’s short Prey Alone led to them writing and directing the sci-fi actioner Lockout for Luc Besson’s EuropaCorp and FilmDistrict.

Rather than scrape together financing for a small indie, a visionary director can simply send a link to his short to someone in the industry, and everyone’s seen it within an hour. The heat generated from a viral explosion can put an auction-like target on a filmmaker.

“Carl Rinsch had been kicking around for years, but when he made [the 2010 short] The Gift, it got sent around and it created a frenzy,” Friedman says. “That doesn’t happen without that perfect storm of the right idea executed well, with the technology to share it virally.”

Studios want and need movies, but they have less and less interest in developing them internally. From multiple accounts, rookie filmmakers are put through their paces by nervous studios before a green light. But by choosing to hire unproven talent, studios are also getting less expensive filmmakers that are potentially easier to control and can be loyal to the studio if the film is a hit.

Blomkamp had only about $30 million but made District 9 seem a lot bigger. When it grossed $211 million worldwide, the path widened for other first-time visionaries, and Blomkamp is now directing the $125 million Elysium for Sony, which released District 9 through TriStar.

But the strategy is not without risk. Sony distributed Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck’s Oscar-winning debut The Lives of Others via Sony Pictures Classics. But when the studio gave him $100 million to make The Tourist with Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp, it grossed only $67 million domestically amid critical pans (the film did better overseas, grossing $163 million).

And as Rinsch goes into production on Ronin, he might want to take stock of first-timer Kinka Usher, a DGA Award-winning commercials director whom Universal gave $70 million in 1999 to make Mystery Men. The superhero spoof ultimately grossed just $33 million globally, and Usher has been making commercials ever since.



 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-18-2011 05:52 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I expect a fair bit of it too is that the studios can get exactly what they want from these guys...not necessarily good news for movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-18-2011 10:05 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry to sound like a cynic yet again, but the answer to why studios are trusting "untested" directors with major feature projects is honestly a very stupid question with a very obvious answer.

1. Directors of national TV commercials and/or music videos have given the "suits" running Hollywood just as visually impressive a résumé reel as anything any well known director could deliver. At least in terms of nuts and bolts technical type shit is concerned. Actual story line, acting performance and other nuances don't mean squat.

2. Unlike well known directors a newcomer moving into features from TV commercials and music videos is usually very young, has lots of energy and is very very very very very very very easy to boss around. The movie studio's focus group can get final cut say over a music video director. The focus group has a much more difficult time trying to override guys like Spielberg and Scorsese.

A seasoned movie director definitely has a big ego. Especially one with any sort of chartable success. The only thing that matches or perhaps surpasses that is the ego of a producer. Titanic sized egos from a producer and director cannot fit on one single movie set. The producers have more clout to boss around people, so the easy thing is to hire a director who can take being bossed around instead of a name above the title director who also has a producer's credit.

Ultimately, it's a control thing. The old fart directors with proven track records are way too challenging to studio brass who want to muscle in their Wall Street focus group inspired bullshit suggestions. Get a new director who doesn't know shit into the game and you'll be able to play his ass for several films before he understands what went wrong. At that point just get another younger hot shot in there to replace the upstart who just turned into a know it all asshole.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-18-2011 11:51 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wish Hollywood would trust me with a major project. Make it happen for me!

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Petrov
Five Guys Lover

Posts: 1121
From: El Paso, TX
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 02-19-2011 12:54 AM      Profile for Tom Petrov     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They are using the director because they are easier to control and get what they want. No production companies, egos, etc etc are attached to these directors.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 02-19-2011 01:12 AM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Too bad they can't talk to RKO about how they found Orson Welles...

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-19-2011 04:58 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Right now I'm really more concerned about a Keanu Reeves version of the 47 Ronin being a "major job". This has horrible movie written all over it no matter who directs.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-19-2011 05:36 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Make it happen for me!
Get your people to talk to my people. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Dan Biegner
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Northampton, MA USA
Registered: Dec 2010


 - posted 02-21-2011 10:32 AM      Profile for Dan Biegner   Email Dan Biegner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Might be a J.J. Abrams advertising technique too. You attach a director no one knows anything about to a project, you don't really know what to expect. But if you attach a very well established director, like Fincher today or Bay today, and people have an idea of what to expect. At this point, there are are plenty of people who will go see a movie because it's Michael Bay or, if you are like me, will avoid a movie because it is Michael Bay. With an unknown director, most people are sort of in the dark. So you might actually wind up garnering more or consistent interest because the majority don't have a clue. (Which is how JJ Abrams advertises everything he does, and it works!)

If that is part of it, I'm sure it's a minor thing. Still.

(Newb to the forum, by the by. Howdy, Thread Heads!)

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.