|
|
Author
|
Topic: Watching films in a theatre and at home
|
Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God
Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 11-14-2015 05:13 PM
There was a time when watching films in a theatre was a treat with a gorgeous big picture and sound compared to watching the same movie much later on television. In the old days before television when I was little, I was already aware of how beautiful three strip Technicolor was and was amazed with Natural Vision dual projection 3D , thrree panel Cinerama and 70mm. I was also impressed with the introduction of CinemaScope and VistaVision in the fifties.
No matter what format, I loved watching movies in a theatres because of the wonderful quality of the projected image until now. As you all know, the home U entertainment industry has been doing a good job keeping up with the technology that originated in movie Theatres. First with surround sound followed by 5.1 digital sound. For many years, home entertainment even had 7.1 sound that theatres did not have until recent years.
When I saw my first digitally projected movie, I was very impressed because it looked like I was watching film without scratches. After awhile when digital took over, I had no complaints until I began to notice how much better movies looked on my high definition televusion than in a theatre. There was a movie titled ALOHA I went to see in a theatre I frequent on a regular basis because it was filmed in my state and found the picture quality drab and did not have that film like quality. When the movie was released on Blu Ray, I rented it from Netflex just to see how it compared to what I saw at the theatre. The picture quality on the BD was gorgeous with film like picture quality and a tremendous difference from I saw at the theatre. I just saw BRIDGE OF SPIES earlier this week in the same theatre and once again, I saw the same drab picture quality. The theatre is the Regal Pearl Highlands near where I live and was wondering if the probkem with the poor picture quality is the faul of this theatre or is it industry wide.
-Claude
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!
Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 11-14-2015 08:10 PM
Sounds like it should be the reverse situation doesn't it?
In 2010 and 2011 I installed quite a few of the Sony 320s in Regal locations all over CA, OR, WA, NV, ID and PA (didn't get a chance to do any in HI dangit!) - some of them in some pretty big houses with screens on the order of 50 feet or wider. Later on I moved on the doing NEC and a couple of Barco installs for Regal and some other chains in the midwest, while the previously installed Regal Sonys were moved to smaller screens. Also did some 2D to RealD 3D retrofits at a couple of CA Regal locations equipped with Sonys.
So, I don't have a comment on why that location would be having problems on its smaller screens equipped with Sonys. The larger Regal screens started out with Sony, but by now most of them should have been replaced at Regal with one of the DLP/Xenon- or laser-based machines from Christie, NEC, or Barco.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|