|
|
Author
|
Topic: Nifty cooling fluid...
|
|
Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006
|
posted 02-28-2017 01:56 PM
WoW, Mark... that is pretty amazing. I've heard of submersive cooling, but have never seen it "in action". I'm assuming the liquid must be non-conductive. I think $400/gal is still cheaper than printer ink.
I wish they could apply this to some of the new projection systems. I've been working a lot with laser DCP projectors lately, and one of the things I was surprised at is how noisy they are. In one booth, the two DolbyVision projector heads have 24 fans each, & at least another 30 more in each of the laser racks, plus the power supply fans and the dedicated ventilation system for the laser modules.
It all creates a lot of noise, even in a large (50x27ft) booth. I'm tempted to bring in a meter and measure it some day. I'm almost sure it must be over some OSHA spec for acceptable noise level.
I'd give anything to be able to put all that stuff in a vat of coolant that would quelch the noise level, as well as keep them cool.
Maybe we could even raise the temperature of that booth a bit, since it's now kept comfortably at what seems to be a few degrees above freezing, mainly for the sake of the laser systems.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Roddy
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 114
From: Spring, TX, United States
Registered: Dec 2012
|
posted 03-15-2017 11:02 PM
quote: Jay Glaus I don't know what exactly is in that coolant, but I know I've seen a few computer tower builds where everything is submerged in mineral oil.
I do remember the fad of submerging components in mineral oil. It died out pretty fast when people realized that it's just dumb. Mineral oil is really expensive (at least for that quantity), does a piss-poor job of transferring heat, and guarantees a new type of hell to experience when you end up having to clean it up. It was only really considered because no other fluid was feasible.
There are plenty of problems with submerging everything, and no real ultimate benefit even if it does work. Even the fluid shown here is only being used as an oversized vapor chamber. Copper heatpipes use the exact same process for transferring heat from smaller surfaces on a much smaller scale, and vapor chambers just spread that over a larger area. And that's where the fundamental flaw with submerged cooling comes into play. The components generating the most heat are pretty small. Why on earth would you want to submerge absolutely everything in it when very little is going to benefit in the first place?
It makes a lot more sense to focus on pulling as much heat away from the most important components (e.g. the DMDs and other chips), while keeping a strong airflow across the rest to maintain a low ambient temperature. And in that regard, submerged cooling is just a pipe dream (there's a pun in there somewhere). I think the projectors would benefit more from a cooling solution that pulls more heat from the important stuff, dissipates it over a larger radiator (the heat exchangers I've seen being used are freaking puny!), and an overall stronger focus on noise. I get the feeling that most manufacturers don't even care about how loud it is.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|