|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Show more older movies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Kornfeld
Film Handler
Posts: 24
From: Cambridge, MA/USA, USA
Registered: Apr 2017
|
posted 08-31-2017 09:43 PM
I'm sorry, but Ive run a number of film-to-DCP conversions of classic titles, & they look nothing like their analogue counterparts. Everything is wrong: the colour is always off, and, if it happens to be a former IB Technicolor release, well, you can forget about that ever looking the way it's supposed to. B&W movies fare especially badly: digital is not kind to that format.
Frankly, all the ones Ive seen look hideous, & I'm embarrassed for the sake of the audience.
I'm sure there are people who will show up to see them, but we'll continue to run prints for as long as we can.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 09-01-2017 03:52 AM
In this summer of bummer, a local art-house made a killing by rerunning popular classics. It seems that people still want to go out to the movies, only they don't want the movies Hollywood is feeding them.
I agree with Justin. The studios often want far too much for those classic movies. Also, studios like Disney with their ever growing reach into the global content market, will usually don't even allow you to book one of their classic titles. Then there is the problem of sourcing a good copy, because like David already mentioned, many of those DCPs out there (if you can even get one), look like crap.
Actually, I'm betting on the 4K Blu-Ray releases for a more reliable source for good looking presentations. Unfortunately, 4K Blu-Rays cannot be ripped and there is still no reliable way to get it from a BluRay player into your projector in 4K and preferably even Rec. 2020 instead of the rather dull looking Rec. 709.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 09-01-2017 11:21 AM
As others have pointed out, the digital remastering of older movies is happening. In fact, it's growing into a significant industry sector, with a subset of post houses and the higher end non-profit archives ramping up activity in this area. For my first year after moving to the US I worked for a small company that imported and sold archival film scanners. During the short time I was there (2013-14), that entire market probably doubled in size, as the cost of this technology and the expertise needed to operate it decreased (e.g. automated dustbusting got better, continuous motion scanners that require less repair to a film element before a scanning pass, that sort of thing).
During the three years I worked for a nonprofit that operated two theaters showing about 90% archival, arthouse and re-release titles, I noticed that the DCPs which were the end result of full scale restorations went from being just the best known classics (for which, if you invest $2m in a painstaking, frame-by-frame hand restoration, you know that you're going to make that money back), to obscure, little-known movies as well. I still do DCP making for a couple of smaller archives as a side operation, and I'm seeing stuff coming through that could never have been properly restored (because of the money barrier), even five years ago.
So I don't think the reason we aren't seeing more classics and archival titles in the mainstream 'plexes has anything to do with the technology. Decent DCPs of the best known ones are already there on the shelf, just waiting to be booked, and they're increasingly being joined by the B-movies, little known Noirs, you name it. Hell, if you wanted to play a French feminist six-hour subtitled 1.66 melodrama from the 1970s in which two depressed women drink and smoke talk about the meaning of life for 11 reels (or 300 gigabytes!), I'm sure that an indie distributor somewhere has it for you!
The reason this isn't happening more is marketing and risk-taking. You have to sell a movie with actors that most of your potential customers won't have heard of, the existing marketing materials will look and sound old (so as a distributor, you'll need to make new posters, trailers, and so on), the story and setting will be unfamiliar (for example, if you don't know anything about prohibition and the Great Depression, the Jimmy Cagney gangster pics won't make much sense to you), and there are other obstacles like that. 99.99% of movies are not "timeless": they are very much of their time, which will give you a problem trying to sell them again, generations later, to customers who weren't around when they were first made and shown.
Without wanting to stray too much into politics, the theater in Memphis that has just canceled plans to play Gone With the Wind has just found that out. The people who complained that it's a work of racist propaganda might not have done if had any serious knowledge both of the film's production and original release, and of the historical events it deals with. But they didn't, and on a less contentious level, it's very difficult to persuade most people to pay to see something that they're completely and utterly unfamiliar with. There'll always be a smaller market for classics, hopefully, and the good news is that the decreasing cost of remastering is enabling that smaller market to bring a wider range of archival titles into circulation again.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-01-2017 03:07 PM
We have always done two or three kids matinees around the holidays. If we're playing a new movie that's kid-oriented, I'll try to find some local entity to sponsor it. Sometimes they'll pony up to the point we can make it a free show, other times we have to charge a dollar or two per ticket.
If we're playing an adult movie, we'll bring in a kid-friendly title that we missed earlier in the year, or maybe something really popular -- depends on the cost. Those, we usually just make free, since they're just out on video and (like with the Cowboys show) we make up the cost on concessions.
In years past, those matinees used to get people lining up four hours early, and some would be severely pissed if their kids didn't get into the show. Nowadays we never have to turn anybody away even if it's free. Part of it is just the massive amounts of other entertainment kids have to pick from, and the other thing is that today's kids are so busy and scheduled and regimented that half of them probably don't even know about the matinees because they have too much else going on.
I feel bad for the kids, being "trained" that watching a movie on a phone is better than actually being with people to see it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|