|
|
Author
|
Topic: WD-40 and optical sound
|
Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 09-14-2003 11:26 PM
Many film-tech members have scorned the use of the popular lubricant WD-40 for use in the projection room, and for good cause. An common occurance is a sticky Simplex G-1985 sound roller assembly, lubricated with WD-40 frees up, but only for a short while.. A week or so later, it is stickier than ever.
However, as I recently found, it can be even more harmful to the proper reproduction of motion picture sound.
I had a call to one of our theatres, 70 miles outside Toronto regarding a "muffled sound" in one of their auditoriums. This booth was equiped with Cinemeccanica Vic 5, and Dolby CP-65 (optical playback only).
Upon arriving at the theatre, I ran the Dolby 251 test reel. I carry this reel on a Strong platter take-up ring, as it provides the quickest method of use.
It had not run for more than a minute when I headed back to the booth.
The theatre had a Bay Area red-led conversion kit installed last spring. It seemed that something was out of alignment with this. (I was biased in my thinking by similar problem a few weeks ago when a unit (that I had NOT installed, btw) was found to be insufficiently tightened such that someone accidentally dropping their had on the "box" caused it to go out of alignment.
Such was not the case here, the box was quite tight in its mount.
I checked buzz-track and tone and then threaded C.N. 69P pink noise test film. (Abacus and Hitachi 20-Mz scope connected to the 240 card). I did notice at this point that the two "lay-on" rollers which sit on top of the sound drum were not turning, and were rather grungy-looking. I removed these and using Brasso and 3-in-one oil, lubricated the rollers and shafts. It was about this time that I noticed the can of WD-40 sitting on the electrical trough in front the projector (half empty, spray nozzle attached). Hmmmmm.
Upon running the 69P test film, I noticed that, as I suspected, the highs were much lower than the low-freqency component.
The results, however, are not what I would have assumed with an out-of-focus lens.
An out-of-focus lens usually causes the higher frequencies to drop rather rapidly. This one had a peculiar 45-degree angle drop from about 500 Hz to about 16 Hz.
I removed the plug-in card from the cell box and stared at it. Smelled it too (nothing burnt). I realized that there weren't much me and my American Beauty 100-watt soldering iron could do for this anyways. I began to try and estimate the time-cost of negotiating traffic through the greater Toronto area, during rush-hour,to our shop to get another "box" and back to this theatre before show-time. I decided against it.
I un-plugged it and pulled the box. The only clue I had was that the lens had a peculiar "color" to it, not so much like a treated lens, but one that had an "oily" hue to it. Perhaps, while trying to spray WD-40 to free the lay-on rollers, someone had lubricated the sound lens too. I thoroughly cleaned it with lens cleaner and cue-tips.
Long story short, I cleaned the lens, re-installed it and performed a complete A-chain on it, and it came up beautifully.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|