Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » The Longest Yard (2005)

   
Author Topic: The Longest Yard (2005)
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-27-2005 03:51 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
ALERT! ALERT! ALERT! Paramount made a good movie!

Yes it's true. I know it's hard to believe, but Paramount after a 5 year stretch of shitty movies has redeemed themselves with this one. (The last good movie to have come from them being Southpark, of course.)

Now don't get me wrong, this isn't a 5 star movie-miracle by any means, but it is certainly entertaining. I say this NOT having seen the original movie and not knowing anything about this one other than looking at the posters and being able to derive:

"hmmmm, here we have another potentially-crappy Adam Sandler movie about football (of which we have way too many football movies as there is) and Paramount made it so it must suck given their track record of the last 5 years."

How nice it was to be wrong!

***SPOILERS AHEAD***

Now no Hollywood movie today can be made that isn't predictable, and this one is no different. The last 2 reels are more boring (but of course REQUIRED per the storyline) than anything. I mean, they HAD to play this football game and you KNEW that the inmate team would initially go for pain the first few minutes of the game and then you KNEW they would kick some butt in the first half and then you KNEW the jail warden would threaten Adam Sandler to throw the game and then you KNEW the third quarter would be spent with Adam Sandler fucking things up and then you KNEW his pride would get the better of him and then you KNEW they would JUST BARELY win the game in THE LAST SECOND. DUH!!!!

***END SPOILERS***

But still the first 4 reels were quite enjoyable and overall the movie was pretty good, and our buddy Phil Hill will certainly enjoy the cheerleaders. [Razz]

3.5 out of 5 stars

 |  IP: Logged

Don Anderson
Master Film Handler

Posts: 312
From: West Bend, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-27-2005 11:09 PM      Profile for Don Anderson   Email Don Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked it too! Much better than the original. Kinda hard to believe that Sandler was a former quarterback, he's kinda skinny. But, the jokes were funny, lots of Football action. Gotta love those cheerleaders!!!!! Lousy job splicing the War of The Worlds trailer onto the first reel. Off by two sprocket holes......IDIOTS. Our evening shows on Friday night were packed! Looks like a hit.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-28-2005 12:25 AM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's a shame they made it a PG 13 flick, the original was a nice R, and had a funny dialogue going in one part, "I broke his f@cking neck".

 |  IP: Logged

Allison Parsons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 630
From: East Peoria, IL
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 05-28-2005 12:51 AM      Profile for Allison Parsons   Author's Homepage   Email Allison Parsons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Don Anderson
Lousy job splicing the War of The Worlds trailer onto the first reel. Off by two sprocket holes
I was wondering if we were the only theatre that had that problem! I guess not.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-28-2005 02:21 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The original had a higher Greco factor too, with Reynolds' girlfriend in the opening scenes. The chick in the new movie is uhhh, not as gorgeous (at least from the trailer...I haven't seen the film yet)

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 05-29-2005 01:44 AM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of our prints had TWO War of the Worlds trailers attached, back to back. Both were spliced on out of frame. In fact, all three prints were spliced incorrectly.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Greco
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1180
From: Plant City, FL
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 05-29-2005 04:05 PM      Profile for Richard Greco   Email Richard Greco   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Courtney Cox has big boobs [Eek!] [Big Grin] [thumbsup] [sex] [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-29-2005 06:48 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
LOL - uh-oh, Richard's having another hormone attack again...

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 05-29-2005 06:50 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I enjoyed it. Nothing great. I wish they had more jokes in between practices.

Best part : Courtney COx's new tits. Are those post preggers boobs or are those implants?

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 05-30-2005 08:59 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Cinemark 16, Fort Collins, CO
AUDITORIUM: 2
PRESENTATION: (Presumably) DTS Digital
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: Playing a Dolby Digital trailer in analog
RATING: 2 and one half stars (out of four)

WARNING: Spoilers are bad for your complexion

Girl at ticket window is talking on her cell phone. Is that really a good example for theatre patrons? "Blah blah blah...blah...blah blah blah...Hi!" "Two for The Longest Yard, please." "Ten fifty. Thank you. Blah blah blah...blah...blah blah blah blah..."

The television commercials fire up in center channel analog. This is a good sign, because every movie I've seen here since "Peter Pan" has been an audio nightmare. The digital fails for lengthy periods of time and the analog wildly pans to different channels across the front sound stage at random. It's so bad, actual patrons get up to complain. Not today, though. The only sound issue appeared to be miscommunication. All but two of the trailers played in digital, and the two that didn't did not have "DTS" listed in the tail credits that I saw. So it was really silly that whoever assembled this print tacked on Dolby's "Stomp" trailer, which, of course, played in analog.

Last year, an all-star cast much more capable than this one ripped "The Stepford Wives" to shreds, and I'm still bitter. So my expectations going into this remake featuring Saturday Night Live alumni and multiple professional wrestlers were far below "low". It didn't help that I happened to be watching this movie in the very same auditorium I saw "The Stepford Wives" redux in.

To that degree, I was pleasantly surprised. Yes, this was far lighter than the original, and duplicating the ending of the original only helped to show how less capable this cast is than the original at drama, but it was still better than I could have ever expected.

I might have even gone three stars if it weren't for the completely unwarranted Rob Schneider cameos.

Nah.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-30-2005 09:08 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From other reviews I've read, apparently they left out the original under-story of the movie, which is the struggle of the prisoners to keep some sort of human-ness against the prison warden, who only sees them as scum. Too bad, that was what made it a classic -- it gave you something to ponder about, while treating you to some fun football action.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 06-05-2005 07:32 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My own feeling ... a film that will be quickly forgotten. This is exactly the kind of product that is killing exhibition; mediocre filler that you still pay high percentages for, dropped-kicked to DVD within two months of release.

 |  IP: Logged

William T. Parr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 823
From: Cedar Park, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-08-2005 10:35 AM      Profile for William T. Parr   Email William T. Parr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Richard Greco
Courtney Cox has big boobs
Down Boy.....Down'

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-21-2005 10:16 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Finally got a chance to see this. The original is better in every way.

I was counting on James Cromwell to redeem himself as the warden, but Eddie Albert in the original was much more sinister and snaky, not to mention believeable.

The scene where the inmates get their uniforms was one of the coolest and funniest parts of the original movie, and was totally botched in this one. As was the scene where Crewe decides to get back into the game.

I could go through scene by scene with complaints, but that would be boring. Suffice to say -- rent the original. No, buy it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.