My wife, child, and I are taking a vacation in a few months' time to visit our relatives in England. As we're going to have to cover a lot of ground to get to all of them during the trip (including Bognor Regis, Lutterworth, Leicestershire, and Craster, Northumberland), and with three of us in the party making train and plane tickets horrifically expensive (multiply by three every time we go anywhere), we decided to go the car rental route.
I noticed something interesting when booking it. Hertz are virtually giving electric car rentals away. Their website offered me a Tesla for literally around half the price of a Vauxhall Astra (the British equivalent of, say, a Nissan Rogue or a Honda HR-V), and the other EVs on offer were also between a third and a half cheaper than their gas- (sorry, petrol-) powered equivalents.
I had to opt for the more pricey dino juice guzzler, because I am not confident about chargers being available when and where we'd need them, and I don't want to waste what precious little time we'll have stuck at a Burger King in a service station on the M1, waiting two hours for the car to charge. I paid $1,100 for the Astra for a 10-day rental (not bad, I thought, given that this is for collection and return at Heathrow, and includes a child seat and full comp insurance), but I could have had a Tesla Model 3 for $680.
Given that the Tesla costs over twice as much to buy as the Astra, what is going on here? Is there some political "nudging" going on (introduce people who have never driven an EV to them, and they'll fall in love with it), have Hertz done a deal with Musk whereby they buy a container ship full of the things for a tiny fraction of what you or I would pay, do they believe that they can pass on that much in lower maintenance costs, or a combination of all of these?
I noticed something interesting when booking it. Hertz are virtually giving electric car rentals away. Their website offered me a Tesla for literally around half the price of a Vauxhall Astra (the British equivalent of, say, a Nissan Rogue or a Honda HR-V), and the other EVs on offer were also between a third and a half cheaper than their gas- (sorry, petrol-) powered equivalents.
I had to opt for the more pricey dino juice guzzler, because I am not confident about chargers being available when and where we'd need them, and I don't want to waste what precious little time we'll have stuck at a Burger King in a service station on the M1, waiting two hours for the car to charge. I paid $1,100 for the Astra for a 10-day rental (not bad, I thought, given that this is for collection and return at Heathrow, and includes a child seat and full comp insurance), but I could have had a Tesla Model 3 for $680.
Given that the Tesla costs over twice as much to buy as the Astra, what is going on here? Is there some political "nudging" going on (introduce people who have never driven an EV to them, and they'll fall in love with it), have Hertz done a deal with Musk whereby they buy a container ship full of the things for a tiny fraction of what you or I would pay, do they believe that they can pass on that much in lower maintenance costs, or a combination of all of these?
Comment