Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amazon Buys MGM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amazon Buys MGM

    cnn:
    amazon buys mgm in a mega media deal

    new york (cnn business) — james bond, meet jeff bezos.

    Amazon (amzn) is investing even more heavily in an entertainment world it already dominates. The company announced wednesday that it made a deal to acquire mgm, the home of james bond and one of the most iconic movie studios in hollywood.

    The deal, which is valued at $8.45 billion, gives amazon an extensive library of film and tv shows that it can use to fill out its prime video content coffers. Mgm has a catalog with more than 4,000 films and 17,000 tv shows, according to mike hopkins, who heads prime video and amazon studios.

    "the real financial value behind this deal is the treasure trove of ip in the deep catalog that we plan to reimagine and develop together with mgm's talented team. It's very exciting and provides so many opportunities for high-quality storytelling," he added.

    The two companies said that the completion of the deal "is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions."

    even though streaming is a small part of amazon's empire, the company has focused on becoming a more prominent player in the entertainment world as of late. For example, a highly anticipated series based on "the lord of the rings" is in the works.
    Prime video — which also features original and award-winning shows such as "the marvelous mrs. Maisel" — is tied to amazon's immensely popular prime program, which offers faster delivery and has more than 200 million paid subscribers. Those kinds of numbers make it a competitor to the likes of netflix(nflx), which has 208 million subscribers.


    mgm and 007




    although mgm's logo of a roaring lion has played in front of some of hollywood's most beloved films, including "the wizard of oz," it doesn't have the deep franchise bench that other studios have.

    So why would amazon want mgm? Three words: Bond, james bond.

    The studio owns a piece of the spy franchise, one of hollywood's most famous film series. The bond brand, which eon productions also controls, is more than a box office success story racking up billions of dollars over the past 60 years. The films and their lead character also represent a lifestyle that branches out to all parts of the globe and pop culture. If prime video is the new home of james bond, that's an alluring proposition for potential consumers.

    Plus, "no time to die," the latest bond film, is set to open this october after being delayed multiple times because of the covid-19 pandemic. away from the suave british spy, mgm also houses franchises including "rocky," "the handmaid's tale," "robocop," "legally blonde" and the epix tv network.


    a consolidating media industry



    another reason amazon would want to acquire mgm is that the media world is consolidating at a breakneck pace. To compete with netflix and disney (dis), companies need scale, and buying up content, networks or studios is the best way to do that.
    The latest major media deal happened on monday when at&t announced that cnn parent company warnermedia would be spun off and combined with discovery. The deal brings together a litany of brands under the discovery and warnermedia banner, including warner bros., discovery channel, hbo, cnn and hgtv.

    Amazon acquiring mgm may not be as earth-shaking as that discovery and warnermedia deal, but it's still quite notable thanks to mgm's historical prestige and amazon's reach and resources.

    But the simplest reason amazon wanted to buy mgm is that it can afford to.

    The hefty price tag for the acquisition is nothing of significant consequence for amazon, one of the world's wealthiest companies. Amazon, which paid nearly $14 billion for whole foods in 2017, has a market cap of $1.7 trillion.

    Ultimately, the deal gives amazon more content, a respected studio in hollywood and a stylish super spy. That will only help it further compete in the ruthless world of streaming.

  • #2
    Rumors about this have been circulating for over two months.

    Comment


    • #3
      Did they get free shipping?

      Comment


      • #4
        “You're one of those Millennials who think you can get whatever you want, whenever you want. Preferably with free shipping.” (Tom and Jerry movie)

        Comment


        • #5
          At least they can now transform whatever remains of MGM's studios to Amazon warehouses....

          Comment


          • #6
            I think most of it is already there. Except for 'No Time To Die'.

            Comment


            • #7
              Interesting WAPO article this morning about the outlook and implications of this deal...

              https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...ng-franchises/

              Comment


              • #8
                Across several decades of Hollywood filmgoing, “RoboCop,” James Bond and “Legally Blonde” have become some of the most beloved titles on the big screen.
                I could not get past the lede. Does not seem like a serious person.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Not to be outdone, Sears to buy Cannon Releasing, Blockbuster Video, MySpace and AOL.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Rusty Gordon View Post
                    Not to be outdone, Sears to buy Cannon Releasing, Blockbuster Video, MySpace and AOL.
                    You should have just posted.... "Dead Company Buys Four Other Dead Companies".

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rusty Gordon View Post
                      Not to be outdone, Sears to buy Cannon Releasing, Blockbuster Video, MySpace and AOL.
                      Was curious on who owns cannon's catalogue now, apparently MGM does! Or at least most of it according to wikipedia

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        MGM has had a wild history of owners, acquisitions, mergers, bankruptcies, splits and whatnot. The MGM brand itself is also a complicated split-personality affair, ever since Kirk Kerkorian started to use it for his Las Vegas toy-projects, after he got bored running an actual studio...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          One thing Bezos gets in this deal that no one has thought about is all The Apprentance TV shows. This will include all the Trump racist out takes...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Mark Gulbrandsen View Post
                            One thing Bezos gets in this deal that no one has thought about is all The Apprentance TV shows. This will include all the Trump racist out takes...
                            That's all in Mark Burnett's possession. I doubt that will ever see the light of day unless someone else made a copy secretly and then they would be in trouble for violating the non-disclosure agreement with Trump and Burnett both.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...tural-heritage

                              This week, Amazon acquired the hallowed movie studio MGM for a sum of $8.45bn, second in size to the company’s $13.4bn purchase of Whole Foods in 2017. The day before, the attorney general of Washington DC sued Amazon over antitrust concerns in the retail market; it joins attorneys general from California, New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Washington state who have also raised similar concerns. Chief executive Jeff Bezos, who is stepping down from the position in July, said in a statement: “MGM has a vast, deep catalogue of much beloved intellectual property. We can reimagine and develop that IP for the 21st century.”

                              It’s chilling, and unsurprising, that Bezos – a man who makes almost $3,000 a second; who makes a couple million dollars every 15 minutes; who, given that the sun is a little over 3bn miles away from Pluto, could travel there and back over 25 times and be paid $1 for each mile – sees a trove of cinematic history as IP to be exploited rather than an important, increasingly vulnerable facet of culture. Really, it’s a flippant and, by this point, almost stereotypical feature of writing about Bezos to try and make practical sense of his wealth. More difficult is trying to rationalize how that wealth has distorted his understanding of art and its role in society.

                              The purchase of MGM has so far mostly been written about in the context of the fate of the studio’s most notable productions: Gone With The Wind, The Wizard of Oz and the James Bond franchise, among other. This week, Variety published an article that was broken down into sections regarding various films and TV shows and what could become of them. Do some fall under the Amazon Prime umbrella? Do others belong to separate property holders due to previous contracts? Such speculation about the ownership of various movies and shows reduces everything down to numbers and titles, emphasizing the fact that these properties are indeed products. Not everything MGM owns is so culturally significant as to warrant pearl-clutching paranoia about its preservation. That’s not the point. And anyone concerned about how this deal tests antitrust laws when it comes to Amazon’s size and potential for monopoly will be disappointed given how small a portion of the film market MGM occupies. But that line of thought is also misleading. What’s consequential is the dilution of both quality and vitality for the cinematic form.

                              The “streaming wars”, as a concept, has taken over the public’s perception of how the entertainment industry approaches the production of its movies and shows: commodities to be traded and hoarded in order to capture subscriptions. Bloomberg framed the MGM deal in terms of hours. “Amazon’s studios produce a few hundred hours worth of television shows and movies a year. MGM adds a back catalog of 25,000 hours that Amazon could divvy up between its Prime Video offering, or its free-to-stream, ad-supported IMDB TV.” Every major studio has developed or is developing its own platform, which has supposedly put pressure on Amazon to expand its streaming options. The result is a selection of subscriptions dizzying and frustrating for any potential audience that wishes to easily access any number of films.

                              As more and more companies bar their 'content' behind fluctuating monthly fees, the collective ownership of cinema deteriorates

                              What gets lost in both the micro and macro conversations about streaming is why the preservation and celebration of cinema, as well as any other threatened art form, not only matters, but why its new life online is so tenuous. As more and more companies bar their “content” behind fluctuating monthly fees, the collective ownership of cinema deteriorates. Physical media like DVDs and CDs, integral artifacts when it comes to the idiosyncratic and long-lived ways that movies are passed on and made precious, are quickly being phased out. Instead, audiences must settle for inferior image reproduction, dead pixels and distracting screen buttons. The theatrical experience, seemingly always on the brink of obliteration, has been overtaken by flashy gimmicks hopefully engineered to get people to arrive and stay. Even the movie studios themselves can’t be trusted to understand what’s best for their archives. Kevin Ulrich, chief of Anchorage Capital Group, MGM’s main shareholder, commented on the studio’s deal with Amazon by saying: “I am very proud that MGM’s Lion, which has long evoked the Golden Age of Hollywood, will continue its storied history, and the idea born from the creation of United Artists lives on in a way the founders originally intended, driven by the talent and their vision.”

                              In this black hole of capital and devaluation, curation is one of the few avenues left to help guard cinema against the ever-growing cynicism and hunger of ever-growing mega companies. Boutique theaters, independent platforms like Criterion and Mubi, preservation initiatives, and the impassioned invective of those who worry about cinema’s future: these current measures seem puny by comparison but they are far from insignificant.

                              In an essay for Harper’s, Martin Scorsese, a film-maker whose legacy and contributions to the art form seem infuriatingly difficult to protect and replicate in our current landscape, wrote: “Those of us who know the cinema and its history have to share our love and our knowledge with as many people as possible. And we have to make it crystal clear to the current legal owners of these films that they amount to much, much more than mere property to be exploited and then locked away.”

                              Art’s utility, power and social value can never be quantified and never should. These “treasures of our culture”, as Scorsese rightly calls them, should proliferate and inspire. To do so, they have to be allowed to exist freely, with the tacit knowledge that they are among the few truly universal things that make life on a dying planet worth living.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X