Why output pinout is always problem when comes to replacement with CP950? Strange but i saw many post about that adresses as the issue.......even i like new pinout, rather than old thx style......don't to mention odyssey d/a converter pinout. But it takes 15 minute to resolder db25 connector. I think 950 is logical replacement as it is afordable than ovation for example, quality is decent with relly good audio performance, plus AES67 outputs are big plus when using network amplifiers. When it comes to cinema with classic range of speakers i doubt there will be big difference if using ovation!? But currently stock is problem as we did get delivery time 20weeks i think now, also two month ago for datasat AP25 I've got not about available in first quarter of 22. Here we just got qsc DCM300 available at the moment i think.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CP750 suggested replacements
Collapse
X
-
CP950. CP850 and the Ovation 1/2 all used TASCAM pinout which I think is a good thing, although it does differ from older/other processors. As someone said, output cables can be sourced easily.
Also Marin, not to get into sales mode but the Ov2 does make a difference with any speakers, I'll leave it for people like Pete Naples to say more but a lot of our replacements are in rooms with older gear that stays the same.
Comment
-
I was recently in an unused booth at a theater here in San Francisco, and I noticed 2 or 3 CP-750's
stacked in the corner. When I inquired about them, I was told they all had "dead power supplies".
At another venue where I am spending most of my time now, They've got a Trinnov processor
and QSC amps. I'm still getting accustomed to the Trinnov, and so far I haven't found anything
not to like. But it's like getting a new car- - you just have to get used to some of the new features
and where all the controls are.
We've also got a venerable CP-650 in the rack, to handle 70mm & 35mm sound.
(DTS, SDDS & 6Trk Magnetic, which I'm told still works, but I've never personally tried it)
I've always liked the 650's. Never had any problems in any of the booths that I've worked
at where they've had them.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stefan Scholz View PostPower supplies are a non Dolby only problem, Mark. Datasat failed quickly, as others do.
Audiowise the Trinnov is a great solution, if you're not into networked stuff, that I would do these days.
And the Dolby 950 at least uses off the shelf output cables, and features network audio on the output side, not that bad. But as I had to find out, it's also not a fast workaround, as these units also have lead time of 2 month plus shipping. Wasn't the fast fix, as intended for a bust 650 in a miniplex.
Actually IMS 3k seems to be a good option, if you're still relying on the DSS show stoppers. Again, no off the shelf item these days.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Cassedy View PostI was recently in an unused booth at a theater here in San Francisco, and I noticed 2 or 3 CP-750's
stacked in the corner. When I inquired about them, I was told they all had "dead power supplies".
At another venue where I am spending most of my time now, They've got a Trinnov processor
and QSC amps. I'm still getting accustomed to the Trinnov, and so far I haven't found anything
not to like. But it's like getting a new car- - you just have to get used to some of the new features
and where all the controls are.
We've also got a venerable CP-650 in the rack, to handle 70mm & 35mm sound.
(DTS, SDDS & 6Trk Magnetic, which I'm told still works, but I've never personally tried it)
I've always liked the 650's. Never had any problems in any of the booths that I've worked
at where they've had them.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
The CP750 does support a redundant, external backup power supply. Since the CP750's main functionality is usually to serve as a DAC for AES inputs from your server, a passive bypass function is probably mostly useless. There was (is?) some UK firm which built an 1U bypass unit specifically for the CP750, it offered some basic bypass functionality for L/R/C and the LFE channel from the AES sources.
Comment
-
The bypass circuits in the JSD-60 and JSD-100 bridge the AES and analog inputs, do an LCR mix of the selected format, set level according to the fader, then provide the output as analog to left, center, and right. The systems go into bypass if power is turned off (and the external DC supply is connected). Just found that requirement at https://mkpe.com/publications/d-cine...2-1.pdf#page=8 .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Babb View PostAlso Marin, not to get into sales mode but the Ov2 does make a difference with any speakers, I'll leave it for people like Pete Naples to say more but a lot of our replacements are in rooms with older gear that stays the same.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harold Hallikainen View PostThe bypass circuits in the JSD-60 and JSD-100 bridge the AES and analog inputs, do an LCR mix of the selected format, set level according to the fader, then provide the output as analog to left, center, and right. The systems go into bypass if power is turned off (and the external DC supply is connected). Just found that requirement at https://mkpe.com/publications/d-cine...2-1.pdf#page=8 .
The CP650 does have a bypass mode and bypass PSU. It downmixes L/C/R into a mono center channel if I remember correctly but won't work with the AES input card...
Also, the bypass PSU needs to be manually switched between 230V and 120V, whereas the primary PSU is auto-swiching.
Comment
Comment