(My responses to multi quotes are in bold italics.)
^^^^^ This, exactly. Even in the film print days, there were certain collectors (and more than a few technicians who had full prints or random reels for testing purposes) that the studios had full knowledge of. Granted, most if not all of such prints were NOT first or second run product, and often of B or C grade films. But other than for one or two notorious individuals, the studios never bothered or cared to go after them for piracy or selling prints.
Yet so far in all of your responses to this thread you never justified those "risks" in Devins case. For your arguments to have ANY validity to what Devin is trying to do, you would have to PROVE that Devin has/can do ALL of the following:
Oh, and RE non encrypted screeners: Most of the "Bel Aire" screening rooms have DCI compliant projection systems, so there is absolutely NO EXCUSE to have DVD screeners anymore. Those who don't have DCI equipment need to go to the theatre like the rest of us to watch their screeners.
Originally posted by John Thomas
View Post
Originally posted by Leo Enticknap
Originally posted by James Gardiner
- Access to DCI encrypted content
- Ability in both hardware and software modification to attempt to hack or bypass DCI security protocols (Which as I mentioned above, his being here and asking what he has so far, tells me he has neither.)
- Motive to use said decrypted content for public exhibition or monetary gain (try proving that, you can't.)
- An outlet to distribute such content for any gain.
Oh, and RE non encrypted screeners: Most of the "Bel Aire" screening rooms have DCI compliant projection systems, so there is absolutely NO EXCUSE to have DVD screeners anymore. Those who don't have DCI equipment need to go to the theatre like the rest of us to watch their screeners.
Comment